A-Vector Gravitational Action
Last updated 04-17-2005.
April 17, 2005 Update:
Recent electrogravitational experiment reports (below) suggest
that a pulse of d.c current excites magnetic domains across a frequency
spectrum and part of that spectrum is what rotates the domains at the
rate necessary to resonate. By resonate, I mean the A-vector associated
with the orientation of the magnetic domains will rotate to a point
where they will be pointed at the Earth when the pulse current is
synchronously applied. It may help to bias the domains with a steady
magnetic flux via a second winding on the torus. This will be
investigated to see if that is true.
The resonance may build the A-vector at the right time so that the
anti gravitational force will build up over time. When a pure 60 Hz
sine wave of current was applied to the toroid winding, the result was
attraction, not repulsion. This was evidently a non resonate frequency
for the permeability of the toroid core being tested. However, if the
exact sine wave frequency (such as is contained within the spectrum of
the pulse current) is found, it may pump up the amplitude of the
A-vector at the right time when the domain is synchronously rotating in
the iron medium. Thus, this process may not work in just the air or in
a vacume since magnetic domains are nonexistent.
That may be the secret of the powdered iron core torus of Fran De
Aquino. Furthermore, Edward Leedskalnin may have used a combination of
a.c. potential field as well as a.c. magnetic field to accomplish the
same thing concerning the orientation of the electric domains in the
coral blocks he is said to have levitated. This also applies to the
Kowsky-Frost experiment wherein a quartz crystal was said to have been
levitated using a strong electric field bias while also being impinged
by a radio frequency electromagnetic field.
There is a plethora of design possibilities that may work as long as the mechanics as outlined above are accomplished.
It is of interest that in some cases, UFO's have left an oily film on
the surroundings where the craft have been observed to land and the
oily film contained ferromagnetic particles in abundance. It is also
established that true crop circles have magnetic particles in abundance
within the perimeter of the circle.
Test Report Date: March 21, 2005
Subject: Balance Beam Current Transformer Test Results.
Test results utilizing a 60 Hz current sine wave have the following results:
1. Placing thin steel sheeting between the balance beam end mounted
torus and the Earth causes measurable attraction increase as compared
with no steel sheeting. Thereafter, a doughnut of iron wire placed
under the balance beam current transformer caused a very pronounced
movement towards the Earth as compared to the thin steel sheet as above.
2. A fixed position current transformer having the secondary shorted
and mounted above the moving current transformer will cause lift of the
moving torus and iron sheeting will increase the lift when placed
between the two current transformers.
3. Removing the upper fixed current transformer while leaving the iron
sheeting in place will cause no net motion of the current energized
moving current transformer.
4. A current is induced into the fixed current transformer from the
active current driven transformer even through shielding by the
The presence of higher than air magnetic permeability between the
active current transformer and the Earth or another fixed current
transformer increased the attraction of the current driven current
transformer to the Earth or the fixed current transformer.
Removing the fixed current transformer from the vicinity of the moving
current driven transformer while leaving the steel sheet caused no
discernible attraction to the steel sheet which suggests that
attraction was not accomplished via magnetic flux force acting on the
iron/steel in the intervening sheet of steel.
The results agree with the form of the electrogravitational equation
which utilizes a connecting permeability constant equal to the
permeability of free space. The magnetic vector potential is not
shielded against by ordinary magnetic or conductive metal and this
shows up in the induced current action in the fixed current transformer
that occurs even through the iron/steel sheeting from the current
driven moving current transformer.
Previous tests involved a pulse width controlled d.c. current at
approximately 16 kHz which caused repulsion of the Earths gravitational
field. This suggests that the wave shape and/or frequency of the
driving current may play an important role in the type of field
interaction that the current transformer accomplishes on the ambient
Driving current is 6.6 ampere sine wave at 60 Hz into secondary of
current transformer as described on my web site. This is a 40:1 ratio
saturable reactor construction. The active current transformer is
mounted on a wooden balance beam. Current is limited by a suitable
series resistance type load cell capable of dissipating about 800 watts
and supplied with nominal household voltage of 125 volts a.c.
Measurement is accomplished via an electronic offset voltmeter assembly
also described on my web site. Nominal separation of current
transformers is 1 cm.
Final Comments and Recommendations:
Further testing and analysis is necessary to determine why it is that
pulse currents cause repulsion while sine wave currents cause
attraction concerning the ambient gravitational field.
Current transformers are wound in a torus fashion. Recent
tests were performed to determine if the A Vector generated by a pulsed
current torus configuration would interact with the gravitational field
of the Earth. Included with this test report is a link to the test
recently presented on the web site of a similar test by Telos Research.1
This test report verifies the results of the Telos test.
In the Telos test, a smaller torus is mounted in close proximity to a
larger torus, and the center axis of both toroids is common and aligned
parallel. In my own test, one torus is used to prove that the A-Vector
is the most important feature related to electrogravitational action
although more that one torus mounted as in the Telos test will likely
enhance the gravitational action.
The current transformer 2 I used is available
from Jameco Electronics and thus is easily available for those wishing
duplicate my tests. A picture of the current transformer is shown below
with the windings exposed for determining the direction of current in
the windings relative to the direction of the current path through the
center of the torus. Tests have demonstrated that the A-Vector transits
the iron pipe with no reduction in field strength. This test is
demonstrated in an mpg video included in my complete works CD, Electrogravity Works 3.
The test torus was mounted at the end of a sensitive balance beam so
that the opening in the center has the center axis vertical, or
perpendicular to the Earth's surface. The torus center opening was void
of conductors or other material. When the torus was energized with
pulses of current, the torus rose into the air. When the current pulses
were reversed in polarity, the torus rose again into the air. The
A-Vector pointing up caused the torus to raise slightly more than when
the A-Vector pointed down towards the Earth. When the torus was
oriented so that the torus axis was horizontal with respect to the
surface of the Earth, only a slight rise was noted with both polarities
of toroid winding input pulses.
Testing was also done for the condition of one lead lifted and tied to
the opposite polarity lead at the toroid connector. There was no rise
or fall of the beam with zero current going through the toroid. All
other conditions regarding current level and test parameters remained
the same. The purpose of this test was to eliminate the possibility of
artifact readings occurring due to stray coupling a.c. fields unduly
influencing the balance beam electronic measuring circuit.
Analysis Of Results
The A-vector is known to exist outside of the torus wound coil but the
magnetic flux is trapped inside the torus. The A-vector changing with time
generates a -E volts/meter field outside of the torus and consequently causes current in
a conductor to move opposite in direction than the current that generated the
original A-vector. This explains Lenz's law more directly than Maxwell's
equations which deal with time varying magnetic flux. Thus, the A-vector is
more fundamental than the magnetic flux. When the A-vector changing with time
acts on a charge in a conductor, force is the result which then amounts to
Therefore, for the case of the iron wire reportedly shot out of the
center of a toroid wound set of coils when the coils were pulsed by a
heavy current, we cannot attribute the action to the explanation of
Lenz's law but rather the more fundamental action of the time changing
A-vector. (Lenz's law states that a magnetic field is built up to
oppose the magnetic field that is attempting the induction. There is
not a magnetic field in the torus center to induce with.) Further,
Lenz's law provides for a repulsion of the iron wire in the direction
of minimum opposing field. That is, if it is induced opposite magnetic
flux causing repulsion, the side with the most iron wire sticking out
of the center axis of the toroid will also be the direction that ejects
the iron wire. The wire will thus not likely have a central point of
It is also established that a copper
wire will not be affected at all when subjected to the same
current-impulse field as for the iron wire. If Lenz's law applied as an
explanation for the iron wire being shot out of the current-impulsed
torus, the copper wire would have also been similarly affected.
The faster the rate of change
of the A-vector, the stronger the action will be. Further, the A-Vector acts
on matter in general. Not just on charged particles. In the quantum sense,
the A-Vector is a momentum changing vector field. It works on all matter
containing energy. This explains the paper dot experiment where a paper dot
was flipped into the air from the pulsed toroid configuration as previously
I would like to pose this question: What if all A-Vectors had
the same velocity in the direction of the vector? If so, then A-Vectors
pointing in the same direction and inline to each other could not interact
with each other. Only if the A-Vectors were pointed at each other would
interaction of the A-Vector field occur. This would explain how I measured
lift of the torus with the recently reported balance beam experiment where
one polarity of pulses generated almost twice the lift than the other but
both polarities generated lift. The center of the torus has more A-Vector
field and is thus is a more dense action field that the outside of the torus.
A little thought tells us that if the center of the torus is opposite vector
to the Earth's field of gravity, a strong action occurs. However, reversing
the polarity of the A-Vector field by reversing the pulse current polarity
will cause the A-Vectors through the center of the coil to be in the same
direction as the Earth's A-Vectors and thus no action of force occurs through
the center but does occur around the weaker field of the outside of the torus
A-Vector force field.
Of relevance is the fact that the A-Vector is inline, or in the same
direction as the current flow. The A-Vector associated with the inside
of the current carrying torus windings will create current in a center
conductor passing through the center of the torus and further, the
current will be in the opposite direction as the current passing through
the windings inside of the torus proper.
The relative current direction test was accomplished via an
oscilloscope externally triggered (+) from the toroid winding signal
input. It was verified that a loop of wire having a series resistor of
about 1 ohm allowed for the voltage drop across the resistor to be
measured relative to the primary signal time. The toroid winding signal
was provided by a variable pulse width 12 volt d.c. motor control
circuit fed to the torus winding through a 1 ohm current limiting
resistor. It was formally established that the direction of the current
in the inside of the torus windings and the wire passing through the
torus center both had current traveling in the opposite direction. Thus, Lenz's law is upheld concerning the A-Vector action, even in the absence of inducing magnetic flux regarding charged particle motion relative to the sourceing and sinking of current.
It is an important feature of torus winding construction that a torus
contains very nearly 100% of the magnetic flux inside of the torus
windings. Thus interference with the Earth's magnetic field is
minimized to nearly 0%. Further, changing the polarity of the
excitation pulses serves to further remove the Earth's magnetic field
as a source of error.
The A-Vector points in the direction of momentum. This is quite
generally true concerning all energy, charged or not, whether it is a
particle or electromagnetic wave. Further, the group velocity is inline
to the A-Vector and thus the related phase velocity is 90 degrees to
the group velocity. Mass is associated with the group velocity.
Particle phase information (alignment of other particles with each
other) is associated with the phase velocity. A simple analogy is an
ocean wave where the phase velocity is along the crest of the wave
while the group velocity is the forward motion of the water particles
towards the shore. The phase velocity is comparable to the De Broglie
pilot wave which theoretically controlled how a particle moved through
space. Therefore the phase wave controls particles to cause them to
come into alignment by controlling individual particle momentum in an
entangled manner to achieve coherent and synchronized parallel motion.
The product of the phase velocity and the group velocity is equal to
the velocity of the medium squared.
The mathematical relationship of the energy related group momentum and
phase velocity is given as: vp = mc2 / mvg
where the denominator on
the right of the equal sign is momentum.
The least quantum allowed velocity is calculated in my theory of
electrogravitation as being equal to the square root of the fine
structure constant (=8.54 x 10^-02 in meters/second units) which would
be associated with least quantum group velocity and therefore the maximum phase velocity is about 1.05 x
10^18 meters/second. This is for the medium of free space.
It is also important to note that the A-Vector direction remains the
same whether the toroid windings are being energized or de-energized as
long as the direction of the current does not reverse direction. A good
example is a coil having a magnetic core where once energized, a steady
current and associated magnetic field is established. When
de-energized, the current (related to momentum) attempts to maintain
the same direction of flow while the d.c. potential across the coil
reverses as the field collapses. The voltage would tend to build to
dangerous levels across the coil unless we put a diode across the coil
with the cathode on the negative end of the coil. (If we use an a.c.
signal instead of pulsed d.c., the direction of the A-Vector would
change with the direction
of the current.)
Test Configuration And Related Electronic Circuitry:
Pictures of the balance beam and related components are shown below.
Light Detector Amplifier and Damping Ckt.
Infrared Detector and Source in
Beam Two C.T.
Toroids Mounted For E.G. Test
Damping Coil Under Balance Beam Arm Variable Pulse Width Motor Control Ckt.
Motor Control Ckt.
Main Plus and Minus 8 Volt Power Supply
Variable Pulse Width Torus Driver Circuit. (Below)
Balance Beam Null Detecting Amplifier and Auto Damping Circuit. (Below)
Automatic Balance Beam Jitter Damping Circuit. (Below)
Motor Speed control Circuit, Used for Spinning Aluminum Oxide Disk Test. (Below)
The automatic motor speed control is not used for the
electrogravitational A-Vector Torus test. It is used for the aluminum
oxide spin test which will be presented in a different paper.
Since this result supports the Telos test results, further research
investigating the A-Vector gravitational interaction as described above
is strongly suggested. Perhaps the effect can be enhanced by making the
opening smaller which would tend to bunch the A-Vector field into a
smaller space. Also perhaps adding more toroids with the center axis'
aligned along a common vector might add to the gravitational
interaction with the Earth's gravitational field. Finally, it is hoped
that others will also perform this simple experiment and share with the
Yahoo newelectrogravity group their results.
Jerry E. Bayles
References And Related A-Vector Test Links:
Jean-Louis Naudin's A-Vector Toroid Tests: http://jlnlabs.imars.com/vpexp/
David Mason's A-Vector Toroid Tests: http://www.ctglabs.com/teslos1.htm
Note: Ref. 1 below has been altered by the source to eliminate the
record. There was no explanation for the removal of information.